Search found 61 items
We publicly issued our audit report determining whether FHWA’s inactive obligations, which had no recorded activity for 18 months, represent valid financial liabilities or can be used on other projects.
Our review of the Springfield VA, Interchange Project found that project cost estimates have increased by $435.5 million—an increase of 180 percent since June 1994; construction problems have increased costs and could delay project completion; and
The Inspector General testified before the House Transportation-Treasury Appropriations Subcommittee regarding cost drivers on Federal-aid highway projects and the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) oversight of Federal highway funds.
On September 26, 2008 we issued our report on the results of our review of the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) Lower Manhattan Recovery Projects involving a Federal funding commitment of $4.55 billion.
The Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 appropriation for the Department of Transportation directed the Office of Inspector General (OIG) to review the October 2000 Finance Plan for the Central Artery/Tunnel Project (CA/T) to determine whether it complies with
Most FHWA ARRA Projects Will Be Closed Out Before Funds Expire, but Weaknesses in the Project Close-Out Process Persist
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is responsible for ensuring that States close out projects timely, a critical step towards the final accounting of States’ use of Federal funds.
This report presents the results of our audit of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) payments to the states of Virginia, California, New York, Pennsylvania, and Georgia during Fiscal Year (FY) 1999.