Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Audit Reports

Date

Outdated Policies Hinder FHWA’s Ability To Oversee Unobligated Emergency Relief Funds

Requested By
Self-Initiated
Project ID
FS2022022
File Attachment
What We Looked At
In August and September 2017, three costly hurricanes hit the United States and caused devastation to transportation infrastructure, particularly highways and bridges. The Department of Transportation (DOT) provided emergency aid for infrastructure repairs through the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) emergency relief programs. Due to the size of DOT’s investment and the speed required for emergency relief, we initiated this audit. Specifically, we assessed FHWA’s controls over the use of its emergency relief funds.
 
What We Found
FHWA does not always deallocate funds that have not been obligated by the end of the fiscal year, as its policy requires. For example, of the $48,022,716 that FHWA allocated to Florida in 2018 and 2019 for hurricane damages, approximately $46 million remained unobligated in March 2020, but had not been deallocated. FHWA’s Division Offices also do not always deallocate unobligated quick release funds—funds that are allocated quickly for emergency repairs—as required. We noted that Florida DOT took over 10 months to obligate $13.4 million of $25 million in quick release funds, FHWA officials stated that the Agency is not statutorily required to deallocate these funds. FHWA also did not document required approvals for $48 million in quick release funds, and has not deobligated almost $2 million in unneeded emergency relief funds allocated to Texas DOT. FHWA is required to maintain adequate internal financial management controls. By not following its own policies, the Agency increases the risk that unused quick release funds and unobligated allocations will not be available for other States in need. Furthermore, the Highways ER Manual, last updated in May 2013, does not reflect current practices or align with other Agency policies. Still, despite these oversight weaknesses, we found a low incidence of improper payments in a sample of Highways disbursements.
 
Recommendations
FHWA partially concurred with our recommendation 1, did not concur with our recommendation 2, and concurred with our recommendations 3 through 6.

Recommendations

No. 1 to FHWA
Direct the Office of Infrastructure to follow the FHWA Emergency Relief (ER) Manual regarding deallocations of unobligated funds.
Closed on $5,200,000
No. 2 to FHWA
Identify any balance of allocated quick release funds older than 6 months, that will not be obligated through the remainder of the fiscal year and that are no longer needed, including the unobligated quick release amounts described in this report, withdraw or deallocate as appropriate in accordance with the ER policy. Implementation of this recommendation could put $5.2 million in funds to better use.
No. 3 to FHWA
Update the ER Manual's quick release procedures to clarify the documentation needed for funding approval and the responsibilities to maintain sufficient evidence of required approvals for quick release requests submitted in accordance with emergency relief policy and program requirements.
Closed on $1,958,064
No. 4 to FHWA
Instruct the FHWA Texas Division to coordinate with the Texas DOT to deobligate the funds the State no longer needs, as discussed in this report. Implementation of this recommendation could put $1,958,064 in funds to better use.
No. 5 to FHWA
Update the ER Manual to incorporate the requirements in FHWA Order 5182.1, including the routine review of unobligated balances so that funds can be deallocated when no longer needed.
Closed on $176,030
No. 6 to FHWA
Recover the $176,029.71 in unallowable emergency relief payments identified in this report.