Correspondence

-A A +A
skip-to-content

Letter to Chairman Bill Shuster and Chairman Frank L. LoBiondo Regarding FAA’s July 2016 NextGen Business Case

On August 15, 2017, we responded to a letter from Bill Shuster, Chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Frank L. LoBiondo, Chairman of the Aviation Subcommittee, requesting that we review the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) benefits projection in its July 2016 Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) Business Case. In its business case, FAA projected that NextGen will deliver about $161 billion in benefits by 2030, of which the Agency states that $2.7 billion has already been delivered to airspace users and the traveling public. At the Chairmen’s request, we provided information on the: (1) programs FAA included as NextGen programs and whether projected benefits represent a realistic assessment, (2) assumptions behind FAA’s benefits calculations, and (3) various groups FAA assumes will benefit and how the benefits are valued.
 
Specifically, we found that FAA’s benefits estimate is overly optimistic given past experience with introducing new capabilities and the use of out-of-date schedules for some key projects. The majority of FAA’s estimates are for new capabilities that have not yet been implemented, and some new capabilities continue to face challenges in delivering benefits to airspace users. In addition, while FAA recognizes that the key assumptions behind its benefits calculations are aggressive, the Agency does not provide alternative outcomes or adjust for risks that may impact the delivery of benefits to airspace users. Further, FAA relies heavily on valuing the time saved by passengers to make a positive business case for NextGen. While this is a generally accepted practice, some airline representatives are concerned that reporting benefits in one, broad category makes it appear that airlines are receiving more substantial benefits than they actually have achieved. FAA officials also noted that the business case does not include all capabilities that they expect will produce benefits but have yet to be quantified. As a result, FAA’s business case does not communicate the range of uncertainty or complex factors associated with NextGen implementation.